Category Archives: Educational Management

What Makes A Great Teacher

Some have wrongly thought that if they know a subject matter then they can teach it. Some have claimed the title teacher, mentor, professor or what-have-you just because they know a great deal in a field of study. It takes more than knowledge to become a teacher, a lot more to become a good one, and a whole lot more to be great.

Being good at Math doesn’t make one a Math teacher. Having a perfect accent and impeccable grammar doesn’t make a person an English teacher. And if by luck, accident, mistake or necessity, a person was given a teaching load by virtue of just being good at a particular field then that’s very unfortunate, a disservice to the teaching profession.

There’s a whale of difference between knowing a subject matter and knowing how to teach it. It is not a guarantee that when one is an expert in a domain of knowledge that he could be a  teacher in that field. Perhaps he has the potential to become one for he already possesses one of the requirements to become a teacher…and that is mastery in a discipline. But expertise in a field, knowing what to teach, is just the beginning of the journey we call teaching.

Source: What Makes A Great Teacher

Remembering My Teachers

Teacher at Chalkboard

“What is done in the classroom today becomes the indelible memories of tomorrow.” – Robert Brooks

What do we remember most about our teachers? Is it their intelligence or their wit and humor?

Why do we say that we’ll never forget some of our teachers? What made it hard to erase them from our memory – the positive influences they exerted on us or the emotional wounds they may have directly or indirectly inflicted? Do they remain in our memory because of the words of encouragement they said that motivated us to excel or the mouthful they gave that destroyed our self-esteem?

Do we recall the lessons our teachers taught in the class or is it the jokes they shared that we cannot forget to the point that to date those same jokes we also share with others?

Think about this… Is it our teachers’ impeccable display of mastery of the subject matter we remember about them or is it their compassion which made us feel so comfortable in their presence?

Being a teacher myself I often wonder what my students remember about me…or do they remember me at all. Imagine how many students I already had having been a teacher since 1988. Has anyone of them proudly announced my name when asked “Who’s your most favorite teacher?” or “Who among your teachers influenced you most positively?”

Constantly asking myself those questions makes me conscious about my performance in the class. Not that I wish to be popular among my students. Teaching is not a popularity contest. But if I get to be remembered by my former students, I wish that it is for the right reasons and not the wrong ones.

As part of my planning, each time a school term begins I make a conscious effort of remembering my former teachers. Why? My teachers in the past, aside from the subjects they taught, they directly and indirectly showed me “what to do” and “what not to do” as an educator. They contributed the pieces in the teaching-learning model that guides me as I practice pedagogy.

There are several teachers whose names were etched in my memory (although I wish to keep their identities under wraps except for some clues). There are a variety of reasons why after all these years I have not forgotten them.

During my PhD days at Bulacan State University I always looked forward to attending the classes of two professors. One of them taught me that “Whatever we don’t use will die of disuse.” and “In onion there is strength.” Yes, that’s onion… not “union.” The other one bragged that “His PEN   IS six inches long.”

I didn’t consider their brand of humor offensive although I know some of the ladies in those classes felt uncomfortable whenever those professors deliver those double-meaning sentences. I am not sure what made the students pay attention to those professors…the ideas they were expounding or the jokes they interspersed in their discussions.

Even without those double-meaning sentences those two professors were really committed to bringing humor into the classroom. A lot of times that they shared hilarious personal stories. 3-hour long classes in the graduate school are stressful and the best known antidote to stress is laughter.

That’s what they did…gave entertainment on the side while we go through the rigors of graduate school.

But when it comes to sense of humor, no one beats my Psychology and Political Science teacher during my first year in college. Aside from his contagious smile, he had the knack for injecting humor during discussions. I remember him making exaggerated facial expressions and movements.

As Maurice Elias suggests, “Let’s add some more enjoyment to school. We don’t need guffaws — a smile and a little levity can go a long way.”

I was also blessed to have three teachers (one each in High School, College and Master’s) who modeled academic excellence. Each meeting with them was always an opportunity to learn something new. Of course I learned from all of my teachers and they all contributed to my development but these three are simply a cut above the rest.

Their common denominator is they never came to class unprepared and demanded nothing less from the students. They were demanding but were very supportive. I don’t know but there was something different in the way that they taught and the way they carried out their duties as mentors.

Because of this dedication to excellence, one of them (the professor in the Master’s program who influenced me the most), became “the avoided one.” Students, as much as possible, would avoid enrolling in her classes. They were students who wanted their grades to be given to them in a silver platter. They were the ones who consider a weekly reaction paper and several book reviews too much for a graduate student. For me, that was the challenge that I wanted to undergo to test my mettle… to hone my skills.

That was the kind of attitude inculcated upon me by my High School Biology and English 2 (and 4) teacher. She gave us assignments and projects that I considered at that time the equivalent of the requirements for college students. It was difficult but it prepared me to the rigors of college life.

Then in College I had this teacher who taught Shakespeare (and his plays) rarely bringing instructional materials to the class from beginning up to the end of the semester. She did not use audio-visual materials when teaching. She would just stay seated the whole period. But when she talked it was like listening to an audio book. There was never a question from us (the students) she did not satisfactorily answer.

However, I don’t remember the said teachers only because of their brilliance. I had a lot of equally-intelligent teachers but whose names I could no longer recall. But these mesdames are different. They displayed enthusiasm while teaching. I witnessed how much they loved what they were doing.

I would also not forget my Grade VI adviser. I felt so sleepy in her class one day but I was trying very hard not to fall asleep. The reason was during my Elementary days, almost every morning I needed to wake up around 4:00 AM in order to sell “pandesal” (bread) before going to school so I would have extra allowance.

While she was discussing I closed my eyes but I was awake. Then one of my classmates said, “Look ma’am! Ching (that’s my nick name when I was a kid) is sleeping.” My eyelids were a bit heavy so I couldn’t open my eyes immediately when I heard a classmate say that. Then my adviser  responded, “It’s okay. Let him sleep for a few minutes. I saw him selling pandesal this morning.”

That for me was a display of compassion. My teacher did not get angry. She was aware of my situation and she tried to understand. Her simple act of kindness made me feel I am important. It started to develop my self-esteem.

Then I had these experiences with two of my High School teachers that reinforced my self-esteem. My English 1 teacher told me one day, “You’re performing well in the subject. Keep it up!” That was the first time I received a positive comment about my academic performance. Then my Biology and English 2 (and 4) teacher, the same one I previously mentioned, told me also that I can be a good student if I study harder. In addition, she told me that I have a talent in writing.

The words they said nurtured my self-esteem. The things they told me awakened a self-confidence that until now is alive and strong in me. The words they said encouraged me to excel.

Those teachers believed in me and I promised myself not to disappoint them.

In his book entitled “Self-Esteem Teacher,” Robert Brooks explained that “Teachers have a very significant, lifelong impact on all of their students. This impact involves not only the teaching of particular academic skills, but as importantly, the fostering of student self-esteem.”

What do I remember most about my teachers? What qualities did they have that made their memories persisted in my mind and continued to influence my practices as an educator?

Answer: Sense of humor, dedication and enthusiasm to the craft, compassion for the students, and the practice of praising students.

The foregoing are the building blocks of the educational philosophy that I have embraced.

“Most children will not remember what a teacher taught as much as how he or she made them feel. Children who perceive themselves as accepted and valued will work harder and have positive feelings about their school experience.” – Leah Davies

VALUING GRADES

school_a_plus

Students are labeled as pesky when they pester their teachers with questions about their quiz and exercise scores. They are viewed as annoying when, near the end of a semester or shortly after final exams, they email their teachers or call to inquire about their grades.

Teachers say that students are desperate when, after seeing their report cards, they move heaven and earth to make the former reconsider the grades they have given and possibly award higher marks, citing 101 reasons why it must be done. Reasons they give range from queer to valid.

How many times have some teachers violated established rules on testing and measurement, rolling the correction tape over the grades they gave because they were moved either by student appeals or by pressure from the academic gods and goddesses?

Students are often criticized for being so grade-conscious.

But is it their fault?

No!

Students are grade-conscious not because they want to be, but because societal standards force them to be. The policies and procedures in the academe instill that kind of mindset in students’ consciousness. They are seemingly programmed to become grade-conscious.

It all begins at home. Parents keep reminding their children to study hard and get good grades. When the children get to school, the indoctrination goes into full swing. Teachers give a battery of tests and exercises, telling students to perform well if they want to pass the subject — and that, if they want to be on the honor roll, they need to earn high scores.

Parents tell students to study hard; the teachers tell them to study harder. Day and night, students are told that they must get good grades. After school, parents would even acquire the services of a tutor to further improve the academic performance of their children.

That’s how the “getting-good-grades-is-a-must” mentality gets ingrained in the consciousness of the poor little kids.

Companies and corporations deliver the coup de grâce by frequently advertising that they hire only the best and the brightest. And what’s the tangible measurement of these superlatives — best and brightest? Grades. A+, or 1, or 5, or whatever the system calls it.

Society has assigned grades as proof of excellence. Students’ academic performance is measured by their grades. The higher the grades, the more excellent the student. That’s how it goes. Result? The students become grade-conscious. The grades they receive are a microscope, and they are the specimen on the slide. Their academic marks are lenses used to magnify the contents of the shell between their ears.

The parents want them to work hard for their grades — yes, perhaps for the children’s sake, but the grades they receive are also an instrument the parents use to monitor their investment. They want to make sure their children are not wasting the money being spent on their education.

Parents get so mad when their children bring home unsatisfactory academic marks. And of course, when their children perform well academically, they are elated no end. It is a boost to their pride, a feather in their caps.

Schools in any country push their students to the limits of academic achievement because passing standardized examinations administered by their governments redounds to their benefit. It’s good for ranking and accreditation purposes. It’s a boost to their reputation, resulting in more government funding and more enrollees flocking to their gates, with parents more than willing to pay so their children can take a bite of the academic excellence pie.

Parents and teachers keep telling children that good grades are a prerequisite to success, the only way to get a good job. And so the students come to think that the purpose of education is purely economic — to prepare them for a job. And if they fail to get good marks, they believe their future is doomed. They will not succeed.

This is how students are brainwashed into achieving the highest possible marks. This is what has developed among students: tunnel vision about education — that it’s all about getting good grades to be among the best and the brightest, the ones to whom big companies would give a chance at a high-paying job.

Grades have seemingly become a curse. They take the joy out of learning. They make students prisoners in the classroom and the teachers the unforgiving, unrelenting prison guards.

Grades put blinders on students, preventing them from seeing the bigger picture — that education is more than getting good grades, and that its purpose goes beyond getting a job… that education is a preparation for life.

It’s sad that both parents and educators themselves are the ones putting the blinders on the students. They are the ones who put enormous pressure on students to get good grades.

There is nothing wrong with inculcating excellence among students. That’s what schools ought to be doing. There is nothing wrong, either, with encouraging students to get the highest marks possible. But both teachers and parents must not forget to tell them that grades are not the be-all and end-all of schooling. Students need to be told that the world does not end if they don’t receive an A+ (or a 1, or a 5).

Schools must not forget that they exist to prepare students not only to find a job after graduation, but to live life and be productive members of society and humanity.

Grading Grades

aSource: Grading Grades

What Makes A Great Teacher

Source: What Makes A Great Teacher

On Grades and the Hiring Process

me101

The reason students are so obsessed in getting the highest grades possible (A+ or 1 or 5 or what have you) is that the higher the grades arrayed in the transcript of records the higher is their chance of getting employed. This is the paradigm that the academe and society in general slowly constructed in the consciousness of these young people as they grow up and develop as individuals.

This is the way they are trained and developed in a society that thrives on competition. Society has devised a way of identifying the cream of the crop, the top dogs among young people. It’s like the government and the corporate world, in connivance with the academic community, concocted a scheme of pinpointing who among the young populace are the best prospects for leadership positions in both the public and the private sectors in the future. Who among them will be managers and supervisors, who will stay in the rank and file and who will do the dirty jobs. They put tags on them to make sure that they are identifiable during selection processes in the future. And what are those tags? GRADES!

So, the young graduates have tags, their grades listed in their transcript of records. They (the graduates) think that when they are recruited for jobs by the government and the private sectors they have the indelible marks. If they don’t have the As they’re doomed, unlikely to be hired or if ever hired they will be relegated to the lowliest positions forever.

The best and the brightest, the ones with As, they thought, are the only ones who would get hired easily and be given the choicest positions.

Students need to be told that grades are not the be-all and end-all of education. They need to understand that schooling is not just a preparation for a place in the world of work but for life in general.

Students need to understand that while it’s true that good grades are important, it does not guarantee employment. It does not follow that when in your transcript of records you have all As then certainly both the public and the private sectors would open their doors to let you in.

The transcript of records, where the HOLY As are listed, is but an attachment to a curriculum vitae which when submitted constitute only step 1 of a 4-step hiring process.

Having As would certainly create an initial good impression but no company or organization worth its salt would hire people only on the basis of GRADES.

Hiring has always been a 4-step process.

STEP 1: Submission of Resume and corresponding documents and attachments

STEP 2: Interview (or a series of interviews)

STEP 3: Tests (Intelligence, Aptitude and Psychological)

STEP 4: Demonstration of Skills

Companies and organizations who are serious in the trade they are plying know that the best way to filter applicants is make them undergo  all the steps aforementioned.

No organization will hire an applicant after presenting a transcript of records with nothing but As.  There are organizations who render a decision to hire or not after STEP No. 2. That’s their prerogative.

But if the intent is to get the best people then none of the steps should be dispensed with, most specially STEP No. 4, the demonstration of skills. The real capability of an applicant can not be efficiently measured in an interview. Applicants can not just rhetorically explain what are they are capable of doing. They should be made to show and prove  what they could, not tell it.

So, students who may not get the highest academic marks (A+ or 1 or 5 or what have you) need not despair. They just need to prepare and make sure they  are ready for the job interview, the tests, and most importantly , the demonstration of skills.

Those who get the highest grades are not always the best and brightest, specially in settings where the Grave Curve is implemented.

 

ON PHILOSOPHY AND TEACHERS

M.A.D. LIGAYA's avatarM.A.D. L I G A Y A

To say that “no two teachers are alike” is not expressing an assumption but rather stating a universal truth.

Yes, teachers differ in many ways. Even if they may have come from the same culture and graduated from the same college of Education in the same university you don’t expect them to embrace the same philosophies. You don’t see them apply the same methods and strategies in the classroom, approach teaching and learning with the same degree of passion, and treat the learners in the same manner.

Teachers decide which perspective they would use in looking at their role as mentors and in looking at their students. Such perspective depends on either the philosophical foundations they adhere to or their personal set of beliefs, or may be both.

Teachers may have read too much of Hegel,  Kant and Plato that they may have developed idealistic tendencies indoctrinating their students into…

View original post 664 more words