Blog Archives
VALUING GRADES

Students are labeled as pesky when they pester their teachers with questions about their quiz and exercise scores. They are viewed as annoying when, near the end of a semester or shortly after final exams, they email their teachers or call to inquire about their grades.
Teachers say that students are desperate when, after seeing their report cards, they move heaven and earth to make the former reconsider the grades they have given and possibly award higher marks, citing 101 reasons why it must be done. Reasons they give range from queer to valid.
How many times have some teachers violated established rules on testing and measurement, rolling the correction tape over the grades they gave because they were moved either by student appeals or by pressure from the academic gods and goddesses?
Students are often criticized for being so grade-conscious.
But is it their fault?
No!
Students are grade-conscious not because they want to be, but because societal standards force them to be. The policies and procedures in the academe instill that kind of mindset in students’ consciousness. They are seemingly programmed to become grade-conscious.
It all begins at home. Parents keep reminding their children to study hard and get good grades. When the children get to school, the indoctrination goes into full swing. Teachers give a battery of tests and exercises, telling students to perform well if they want to pass the subject — and that, if they want to be on the honor roll, they need to earn high scores.
Parents tell students to study hard; the teachers tell them to study harder. Day and night, students are told that they must get good grades. After school, parents would even acquire the services of a tutor to further improve the academic performance of their children.
That’s how the “getting-good-grades-is-a-must” mentality gets ingrained in the consciousness of the poor little kids.
Companies and corporations deliver the coup de grâce by frequently advertising that they hire only the best and the brightest. And what’s the tangible measurement of these superlatives — best and brightest? Grades. A+, or 1, or 5, or whatever the system calls it.
Society has assigned grades as proof of excellence. Students’ academic performance is measured by their grades. The higher the grades, the more excellent the student. That’s how it goes. Result? The students become grade-conscious. The grades they receive are a microscope, and they are the specimen on the slide. Their academic marks are lenses used to magnify the contents of the shell between their ears.
The parents want them to work hard for their grades — yes, perhaps for the children’s sake, but the grades they receive are also an instrument the parents use to monitor their investment. They want to make sure their children are not wasting the money being spent on their education.
Parents get so mad when their children bring home unsatisfactory academic marks. And of course, when their children perform well academically, they are elated no end. It is a boost to their pride, a feather in their caps.
Schools in any country push their students to the limits of academic achievement because passing standardized examinations administered by their governments redounds to their benefit. It’s good for ranking and accreditation purposes. It’s a boost to their reputation, resulting in more government funding and more enrollees flocking to their gates, with parents more than willing to pay so their children can take a bite of the academic excellence pie.
Parents and teachers keep telling children that good grades are a prerequisite to success, the only way to get a good job. And so the students come to think that the purpose of education is purely economic — to prepare them for a job. And if they fail to get good marks, they believe their future is doomed. They will not succeed.
This is how students are brainwashed into achieving the highest possible marks. This is what has developed among students: tunnel vision about education — that it’s all about getting good grades to be among the best and the brightest, the ones to whom big companies would give a chance at a high-paying job.
Grades have seemingly become a curse. They take the joy out of learning. They make students prisoners in the classroom and the teachers the unforgiving, unrelenting prison guards.
Grades put blinders on students, preventing them from seeing the bigger picture — that education is more than getting good grades, and that its purpose goes beyond getting a job… that education is a preparation for life.
It’s sad that both parents and educators themselves are the ones putting the blinders on the students. They are the ones who put enormous pressure on students to get good grades.
There is nothing wrong with inculcating excellence among students. That’s what schools ought to be doing. There is nothing wrong, either, with encouraging students to get the highest marks possible. But both teachers and parents must not forget to tell them that grades are not the be-all and end-all of schooling. Students need to be told that the world does not end if they don’t receive an A+ (or a 1, or a 5).
Schools must not forget that they exist to prepare students not only to find a job after graduation, but to live life and be productive members of society and humanity.
On Grades and the Hiring Process
The reason students are so obsessed in getting the highest grades possible (A+ or 1 or 5 or what have you) is that the higher the grades arrayed in the transcript of records the higher is their chance of getting employed. This is the paradigm that the academe and society in general slowly constructed in the consciousness of these young people as they grow up and develop as individuals.
This is the way they are trained and developed in a society that thrives on competition. Society has devised a way of identifying the cream of the crop, the top dogs among young people. It’s like the government and the corporate world, in connivance with the academic community, concocted a scheme of pinpointing who among the young populace are the best prospects for leadership positions in both the public and the private sectors in the future. Who among them will be managers and supervisors, who will stay in the rank and file and who will do the dirty jobs. They put tags on them to make sure that they are identifiable during selection processes in the future. And what are those tags? GRADES!
So, the young graduates have tags, their grades listed in their transcript of records. They (the graduates) think that when they are recruited for jobs by the government and the private sectors they have the indelible marks. If they don’t have the As they’re doomed, unlikely to be hired or if ever hired they will be relegated to the lowliest positions forever.
The best and the brightest, the ones with As, they thought, are the only ones who would get hired easily and be given the choicest positions.
Students need to be told that grades are not the be-all and end-all of education. They need to understand that schooling is not just a preparation for a place in the world of work but for life in general.
Students need to understand that while it’s true that good grades are important, it does not guarantee employment. It does not follow that when in your transcript of records you have all As then certainly both the public and the private sectors would open their doors to let you in.
The transcript of records, where the HOLY As are listed, is but an attachment to a curriculum vitae which when submitted constitute only step 1 of a 4-step hiring process.
Having As would certainly create an initial good impression but no company or organization worth its salt would hire people only on the basis of GRADES.
Hiring has always been a 4-step process.
STEP 1: Submission of Resume and corresponding documents and attachments
STEP 2: Interview (or a series of interviews)
STEP 3: Tests (Intelligence, Aptitude and Psychological)
STEP 4: Demonstration of Skills
Companies and organizations who are serious in the trade they are plying know that the best way to filter applicants is make them undergo all the steps aforementioned.
No organization will hire an applicant after presenting a transcript of records with nothing but As. There are organizations who render a decision to hire or not after STEP No. 2. That’s their prerogative.
But if the intent is to get the best people then none of the steps should be dispensed with, most specially STEP No. 4, the demonstration of skills. The real capability of an applicant can not be efficiently measured in an interview. Applicants can not just rhetorically explain what are they are capable of doing. They should be made to show and prove what they could, not tell it.
So, students who may not get the highest academic marks (A+ or 1 or 5 or what have you) need not despair. They just need to prepare and make sure they are ready for the job interview, the tests, and most importantly , the demonstration of skills.
Those who get the highest grades are not always the best and brightest, specially in settings where the Grave Curve is implemented.



